Welcome to WordPress. This is your first post. Edit or delete it, then start writing!
amecheap is a reputable domain name registrar and web hosting service, whereas Bluehost is an even more popular web host that offers domain registration services. But, does this make Bluehost better? Well, probably not. Unlike Bluehost, NameCheap doesn’t pay reviewers to keep showing up on your search results as the best host in the market.
To compare Bluehost and NameCheap fairly, I’ve tested both services in terms of pricing, performance, security, features, and support.
NameCheap – as its name suggests – offers cheaper hosting prices than Bluehost. NameCheap also offers free privacy protection for life with its domain services (Bluehost charges for this), making it the clear winner of this not-so-tough contest.
Regardless, if it were me, I wouldn’t go for either web host. I’d choose InterServer, which offers much better value for your money. Click here to see InterServer’s latest deals, or read on to see if one of these hosts could be right for you.
1. Plans and Pricing
Bluehost Might Be Cheap, but NameCheap Is Cheaper
There are some similarities between Bluehost and NameCheap’s shared hosting offerings, such as a free SSL certificate with all plans, 30-day money-back guarantee, and a free domain name with annual subscriptions for the first year.
There are also many noticeable differences between the two, mainly in pricing. NameCheap’s shared hosting packages come at a much cheaper cost – even after renewal and on a UK data center – than Bluehost.